<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Electric Heat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jaxn.org/article/2008/04/18/electric-heat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jaxn.org/article/2008/04/18/electric-heat/</link>
	<description>the philosophy of technology</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 00:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: gphat</title>
		<link>http://jaxn.org/article/2008/04/18/electric-heat/#comment-34796</link>
		<dc:creator>gphat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 19:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaxn.org/?p=12052#comment-34796</guid>
		<description>Without doing any real investigating, wouldn't the law of converation of energe dictate that the temperature would go down?  Since the light heats the roofs, if the light is being converted into work then less heat would have to be created or else we'd be creating energy...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Without doing any real investigating, wouldn&#8217;t the law of converation of energe dictate that the temperature would go down?  Since the light heats the roofs, if the light is being converted into work then less heat would have to be created or else we&#8217;d be creating energy&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
