<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2008: The Year of the Editor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jaxn.org/article/2008/01/03/2008-the-year-of-the-editor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jaxn.org/article/2008/01/03/2008-the-year-of-the-editor/</link>
	<description>the philosophy of technology</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 19:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Ketsdever</title>
		<link>http://jaxn.org/article/2008/01/03/2008-the-year-of-the-editor/#comment-33603</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Ketsdever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 22:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaxn.org/article/2008/01/03/2008-the-year-of-the-editor/#comment-33603</guid>
		<description>Jackson, 

Just ran across this.  Apparently the folks at Read/Write web agree.  (I think i ran across this on Techmeme)

http://enterpriserss.typepad.com/enterprise_rss/2008/01/2008-the-year-o.html

Take care,
Nathan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jackson, </p>
<p>Just ran across this.  Apparently the folks at Read/Write web agree.  (I think i ran across this on Techmeme)</p>
<p><a href="http://enterpriserss.typepad.com/enterprise_rss/2008/01/2008-the-year-o.html" rel="nofollow">http://enterpriserss.typepad.com/enterprise_rss/2008/01/2008-the-year-o.html</a></p>
<p>Take care,<br />
Nathan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve H.</title>
		<link>http://jaxn.org/article/2008/01/03/2008-the-year-of-the-editor/#comment-33515</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 20:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaxn.org/article/2008/01/03/2008-the-year-of-the-editor/#comment-33515</guid>
		<description>@ fishwreck

But blogging is the new self-publishing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ fishwreck</p>
<p>But blogging is the new self-publishing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackson Miller</title>
		<link>http://jaxn.org/article/2008/01/03/2008-the-year-of-the-editor/#comment-33504</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackson Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 07:10:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaxn.org/article/2008/01/03/2008-the-year-of-the-editor/#comment-33504</guid>
		<description>Christy such is the price you pay to be a trendsetter.  Though as I look into my crystal ball it looks like &lt;a href="http://www.shopghia.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;socially responsible retail&lt;/a&gt; is gonna be huge in 2008 too :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christy such is the price you pay to be a trendsetter.  Though as I look into my crystal ball it looks like <a href="http://www.shopghia.com" rel="nofollow">socially responsible retail</a> is gonna be huge in 2008 too <img src='http://jaxn.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackson Miller</title>
		<link>http://jaxn.org/article/2008/01/03/2008-the-year-of-the-editor/#comment-33503</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackson Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 07:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaxn.org/article/2008/01/03/2008-the-year-of-the-editor/#comment-33503</guid>
		<description>Nathan, what do you mean by "frontline all your social media trends"?

As for how crowdsourcing compares to traditional outsourcing, I think the StudioNow model creates value by making the process more efficient.  The customer doesn't have to find an editor and interview them and the editor doesn't have to create proposals and contracts and worry about billing.

P.S. monetary reward is not the only reward.  The key is to provide compensation that is acceptable to both parties.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nathan, what do you mean by &#8220;frontline all your social media trends&#8221;?</p>
<p>As for how crowdsourcing compares to traditional outsourcing, I think the StudioNow model creates value by making the process more efficient.  The customer doesn&#8217;t have to find an editor and interview them and the editor doesn&#8217;t have to create proposals and contracts and worry about billing.</p>
<p>P.S. monetary reward is not the only reward.  The key is to provide compensation that is acceptable to both parties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Ketsdever</title>
		<link>http://jaxn.org/article/2008/01/03/2008-the-year-of-the-editor/#comment-33502</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Ketsdever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 07:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaxn.org/article/2008/01/03/2008-the-year-of-the-editor/#comment-33502</guid>
		<description>I'm sorry to double post...but I had one more thought.  I wonder how the Crowdsourcing alternatives like Studio Now or http://www.domystuff.com/ compare to more traditional outsourcing methods like e-lancing and Craigslist. 

Interestingly enough and randomly enough too...Horsecowpig had a recent post against the free and potentially exploitive nature of some types of crowdsourcing.   In counterpoint to her, it just enhances customer service.  Alternatively, traditional questionaires for studies often have some monetary reward.

Keep on rock'n!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry to double post&#8230;but I had one more thought.  I wonder how the Crowdsourcing alternatives like Studio Now or <a href="http://www.domystuff.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.domystuff.com/</a> compare to more traditional outsourcing methods like e-lancing and Craigslist. </p>
<p>Interestingly enough and randomly enough too&#8230;Horsecowpig had a recent post against the free and potentially exploitive nature of some types of crowdsourcing.   In counterpoint to her, it just enhances customer service.  Alternatively, traditional questionaires for studies often have some monetary reward.</p>
<p>Keep on rock&#8217;n!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nathan Ketsdever</title>
		<link>http://jaxn.org/article/2008/01/03/2008-the-year-of-the-editor/#comment-33501</link>
		<dc:creator>Nathan Ketsdever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 06:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaxn.org/article/2008/01/03/2008-the-year-of-the-editor/#comment-33501</guid>
		<description>Great post!

Why would it have to be in print?  Having to wait 4-7 days for the info might actually have added value, because you would get more news that was outside the crazy news cycle.

Jax why not frontline all your social media trends or there should be an X type posts?  This is some advice I could take myself.  Just a thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post!</p>
<p>Why would it have to be in print?  Having to wait 4-7 days for the info might actually have added value, because you would get more news that was outside the crazy news cycle.</p>
<p>Jax why not frontline all your social media trends or there should be an X type posts?  This is some advice I could take myself.  Just a thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Wallace</title>
		<link>http://jaxn.org/article/2008/01/03/2008-the-year-of-the-editor/#comment-33499</link>
		<dc:creator>John Wallace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 05:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaxn.org/article/2008/01/03/2008-the-year-of-the-editor/#comment-33499</guid>
		<description>Jaxn- Thanks for the insight.  We certainly agree that 2008 should be a big year for the editor.

Please drop by our blog any time.  

http://blog.studionow.com

It is largely focused on video editing right now, but your philosophical ruminations would always be most welcome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jaxn- Thanks for the insight.  We certainly agree that 2008 should be a big year for the editor.</p>
<p>Please drop by our blog any time.  </p>
<p><a href="http://blog.studionow.com" rel="nofollow">http://blog.studionow.com</a></p>
<p>It is largely focused on video editing right now, but your philosophical ruminations would always be most welcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fishwreck</title>
		<link>http://jaxn.org/article/2008/01/03/2008-the-year-of-the-editor/#comment-33492</link>
		<dc:creator>fishwreck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 04:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaxn.org/article/2008/01/03/2008-the-year-of-the-editor/#comment-33492</guid>
		<description>Or not: http://www.zeldman.com/2008/01/03/self-publishing-is-the-new-blogging/ (via Gruber, of course)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or not: <a href="http://www.zeldman.com/2008/01/03/self-publishing-is-the-new-blogging/" rel="nofollow">http://www.zeldman.com/2008/01/03/self-publishing-is-the-new-blogging/</a> (via Gruber, of course)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christy N</title>
		<link>http://jaxn.org/article/2008/01/03/2008-the-year-of-the-editor/#comment-33488</link>
		<dc:creator>Christy N</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 04:18:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaxn.org/article/2008/01/03/2008-the-year-of-the-editor/#comment-33488</guid>
		<description>How ironic that 2007 was the year I chose to get out of web editing.
[sigh]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How ironic that 2007 was the year I chose to get out of web editing.<br />
[sigh]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve H.</title>
		<link>http://jaxn.org/article/2008/01/03/2008-the-year-of-the-editor/#comment-33485</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 03:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaxn.org/article/2008/01/03/2008-the-year-of-the-editor/#comment-33485</guid>
		<description>Everyone needs an editor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone needs an editor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
