<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why I Chose an ARM Mortgage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jaxn.org/article/2005/02/18/why-i-chose-an-arm-mortgage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jaxn.org/article/2005/02/18/why-i-chose-an-arm-mortgage/</link>
	<description>the philosophy of technology</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-beta2-9582</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Why Buy a House When You Can Rent at Jackson Miller</title>
		<link>http://jaxn.org/article/2005/02/18/why-i-chose-an-arm-mortgage/comment-page-1/#comment-806</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Buy a House When You Can Rent at Jackson Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 17:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaxn.org/article/2005/02/18/why-i-chose-an-arm-mortgage/#comment-806</guid>
		<description>[...] I just read a post by Chris Welch titled Misconception: Renting is for Suckers. My take on it is that when buying a house you are not making an investment as much as you are committing to a liability. They talk about PITI costs (Principle, Interest, Taxes and Insurance). This of course reminds me of my current situation which I wrote about in Why I Chose an ARM Mortgage. Here is some of what I said then: Essentially we are only paying rent on this house. However, our gamble (business plan) is that the value of the property will continue to grow at a somewhat similar rate for another year or two. This house will be a liability for a few years, but it does have the opportunity to yield a pretty great return. As long as the house appreciates at a rate that is higher than our interest rate (which is below 6%), than when we sell the house in a few years we will have lived there for free and will still make money. To me this means I can count this purchase as an investment instead of as a liability. We will have some equity thanks to our down payment and the growth rate. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I just read a post by Chris Welch titled Misconception: Renting is for Suckers. My take on it is that when buying a house you are not making an investment as much as you are committing to a liability. They talk about PITI costs (Principle, Interest, Taxes and Insurance). This of course reminds me of my current situation which I wrote about in Why I Chose an ARM Mortgage. Here is some of what I said then: Essentially we are only paying rent on this house. However, our gamble (business plan) is that the value of the property will continue to grow at a somewhat similar rate for another year or two. This house will be a liability for a few years, but it does have the opportunity to yield a pretty great return. As long as the house appreciates at a rate that is higher than our interest rate (which is below 6%), than when we sell the house in a few years we will have lived there for free and will still make money. To me this means I can count this purchase as an investment instead of as a liability. We will have some equity thanks to our down payment and the growth rate. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
